This is a really good example of quick and effective testing. A small bit of code allows you to cover aesthetic, layout and formating issues (none of which are easily automated) very quickly.
The other big advantage of this approach is the amount of test coverage provide by this short code based solution. I would have thought you could achieve even more by quickly sending the URL out to the whole test team saying please give me your feedback.... making this not only a quick solution, but solution that easily gets good coverage from dissemination to lots of other testers (or even developers).
Yes it could be argued that this approach might not be a very thorough and scientific approach. It may also take a long time to go through each iFrame in detail. Having said that, you can quickly pick out the big issues and get the developers working to resolve those in a very short space of time.
So whilst the code gets the focus here I think the approach used here should be held up as a great example of good testing too.
This is a really good example of quick and effective testing. A small bit of code allows you to cover aesthetic, layout and formating issues (none of which are easily automated) very quickly.
ReplyDeleteThe other big advantage of this approach is the amount of test coverage provide by this short code based solution. I would have thought you could achieve even more by quickly sending the URL out to the whole test team saying please give me your feedback.... making this not only a quick solution, but solution that easily gets good coverage from dissemination to lots of other testers (or even developers).
Yes it could be argued that this approach might not be a very thorough and scientific approach. It may also take a long time to go through each iFrame in detail. Having said that, you can quickly pick out the big issues and get the developers working to resolve those in a very short space of time.
So whilst the code gets the focus here I think the approach used here should be held up as a great example of good testing too.
William Echlin
SoftwareTesting.net