Testing Blog

Announcing: New Google C++ Testing Framework

štvrtok, júla 03, 2008
Share on Twitter Share on Facebook
Google
Menovky: C++ , Zhanyong Wan

11 komentárov :

  1. Remko Tronçon3. júla 2008 o 23:18:00 GMT-7

    On first sight, it seems that Google Test doesn't provide much over CppUnit. However, when I look a bit deeper into the advanced part of the manual, I'm finding interesting new things. Maybe it would be good to have a list of features why one would choose Google Test over CppUnit?

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  2. Remko Tronçon3. júla 2008 o 23:56:00 GMT-7

    Btw, I had to apply the following patch to make it compile for me:
    http://el-tramo.be/files/gtest/gtest-1.0.0-includeinternal.patch

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  3. Jordi Fita Mas4. júla 2008 o 1:08:00 GMT-7

    I am with remko about a list of features that puts this testing framework apart from others, like CppUnit or Boost's Unit Test Framework.

    I was able compile it without modifications on Ubuntu, though.

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  4. Capt. Jean-Luc Pikachu4. júla 2008 o 8:04:00 GMT-7

    I too am curious about why anyone would choose this over boost::test...

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  5. Kenton Varda4. júla 2008 o 14:02:00 GMT-7

    Death tests are a pretty cool feature, though currently only available on Linux. They let you verify that your asserts trigger when they're supposed to. The syntax is really simple, too:

    EXPECT_DEATH(MyFunction(bad_input));

    Not sure if any other unit testing frameworks support that.

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  6. maksa4. júla 2008 o 14:38:00 GMT-7

    Am I the only one that is bothered by names of things & what one must type to use this?

    EXPECT_DEATH(...)

    should actually be a fatal assertion, and a non-fatal one should be:

    EXPECT_LIFE_AFTER_DEATH(...)

    There, now it seems right.

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  7. Kenton Varda4. júla 2008 o 14:47:00 GMT-7

    Oops, my example was wrong. It's actually:

    EXPECT_DEATH(MyFunction(bad_input),"expected error message");

    maksa: not sure what you mean. Note that EXPECT_DEATH (and ASSERT_DEATH) executes the crashing code in a sub-process, which allows the unit test to continue running after the crash.

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  8. maksa4. júla 2008 o 15:28:00 GMT-7

    kenton wrote:
    >> maksa: not sure what you mean

    Pay no mind, it was just an attempt at a (probably bad) joke, with no pretensions on some technical merit whatsoever.

    It is really fine that Google released this, so far my choice has been UnitTest++ http://unittest-cpp.sourceforge.net/
    It's a bit troubling that this Google thing is yet another C++ unit testing framework, albeit it seems to be the most powerfull so far - if I had a greenfield project I'd most probably go for it. The other (real) problem is how to convnice more people to do unit testing. Still waiting for some magic in that area, and if any of you actively blogging people managed to successfully introduce TDD/UT in his work environment (by "successfully introduce" I don't mean "nobody killed you for writing unit tests"), please don't be shy to write about your experience.

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  9. Kenton Varda4. júla 2008 o 17:14:00 GMT-7

    Doh, I guess I need to write better tests for my humor detector. ;)

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  10. Proud Indian10. marca 2009 o 9:31:00 GMT-7

    Hi, I created a new website and expecting your comments on it.
    http://www.prog2impress.com/index.html

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
  11. katyhuff1. februára 2011 o 13:35:00 GMT-8

    The google test primer link appears to be misdirected. It should direct to : http://code.google.com/p/googletest/wiki/Primer

    OdpovedaťOdstrániť
    Odpovede
      Odpovedať
Pridať komentár
Načítať viac...

The comments you read and contribute here belong only to the person who posted them. We reserve the right to remove off-topic comments.

  

Labels


  • TotT 104
  • GTAC 61
  • James Whittaker 42
  • Misko Hevery 32
  • Code Health 31
  • Anthony Vallone 27
  • Patrick Copeland 23
  • Jobs 18
  • Andrew Trenk 13
  • C++ 11
  • Patrik Höglund 8
  • JavaScript 7
  • Allen Hutchison 6
  • George Pirocanac 6
  • Zhanyong Wan 6
  • Harry Robinson 5
  • Java 5
  • Julian Harty 5
  • Adam Bender 4
  • Alberto Savoia 4
  • Ben Yu 4
  • Erik Kuefler 4
  • Philip Zembrod 4
  • Shyam Seshadri 4
  • Chrome 3
  • Dillon Bly 3
  • John Thomas 3
  • Lesley Katzen 3
  • Marc Kaplan 3
  • Markus Clermont 3
  • Max Kanat-Alexander 3
  • Sonal Shah 3
  • APIs 2
  • Abhishek Arya 2
  • Alan Myrvold 2
  • Alek Icev 2
  • Android 2
  • April Fools 2
  • Chaitali Narla 2
  • Chris Lewis 2
  • Chrome OS 2
  • Diego Salas 2
  • Dori Reuveni 2
  • Jason Arbon 2
  • Jochen Wuttke 2
  • Kostya Serebryany 2
  • Marc Eaddy 2
  • Marko Ivanković 2
  • Mobile 2
  • Oliver Chang 2
  • Simon Stewart 2
  • Stefan Kennedy 2
  • Test Flakiness 2
  • Titus Winters 2
  • Tony Voellm 2
  • WebRTC 2
  • Yiming Sun 2
  • Yvette Nameth 2
  • Zuri Kemp 2
  • Aaron Jacobs 1
  • Adam Porter 1
  • Adam Raider 1
  • Adel Saoud 1
  • Alan Faulkner 1
  • Alex Eagle 1
  • Amy Fu 1
  • Anantha Keesara 1
  • Antoine Picard 1
  • App Engine 1
  • Ari Shamash 1
  • Arif Sukoco 1
  • Benjamin Pick 1
  • Bob Nystrom 1
  • Bruce Leban 1
  • Carlos Arguelles 1
  • Carlos Israel Ortiz García 1
  • Cathal Weakliam 1
  • Christopher Semturs 1
  • Clay Murphy 1
  • Dagang Wei 1
  • Dan Maksimovich 1
  • Dan Shi 1
  • Dan Willemsen 1
  • Dave Chen 1
  • Dave Gladfelter 1
  • David Bendory 1
  • David Mandelberg 1
  • Derek Snyder 1
  • Diego Cavalcanti 1
  • Dmitry Vyukov 1
  • Eduardo Bravo Ortiz 1
  • Ekaterina Kamenskaya 1
  • Elliott Karpilovsky 1
  • Elliotte Rusty Harold 1
  • Espresso 1
  • Felipe Sodré 1
  • Francois Aube 1
  • Gene Volovich 1
  • Google+ 1
  • Goran Petrovic 1
  • Goranka Bjedov 1
  • Hank Duan 1
  • Havard Rast Blok 1
  • Hongfei Ding 1
  • Jason Elbaum 1
  • Jason Huggins 1
  • Jay Han 1
  • Jeff Hoy 1
  • Jeff Listfield 1
  • Jessica Tomechak 1
  • Jim Reardon 1
  • Joe Allan Muharsky 1
  • Joel Hynoski 1
  • John Micco 1
  • John Penix 1
  • Jonathan Rockway 1
  • Jonathan Velasquez 1
  • Josh Armour 1
  • Julie Ralph 1
  • Kai Kent 1
  • Kanu Tewary 1
  • Karin Lundberg 1
  • Kaue Silveira 1
  • Kevin Bourrillion 1
  • Kevin Graney 1
  • Kirkland 1
  • Kurt Alfred Kluever 1
  • Manjusha Parvathaneni 1
  • Marek Kiszkis 1
  • Marius Latinis 1
  • Mark Ivey 1
  • Mark Manley 1
  • Mark Striebeck 1
  • Matt Lowrie 1
  • Meredith Whittaker 1
  • Michael Bachman 1
  • Michael Klepikov 1
  • Mike Aizatsky 1
  • Mike Wacker 1
  • Mona El Mahdy 1
  • Noel Yap 1
  • Palak Bansal 1
  • Patricia Legaspi 1
  • Per Jacobsson 1
  • Peter Arrenbrecht 1
  • Peter Spragins 1
  • Phil Norman 1
  • Phil Rollet 1
  • Pooja Gupta 1
  • Project Showcase 1
  • Radoslav Vasilev 1
  • Rajat Dewan 1
  • Rajat Jain 1
  • Rich Martin 1
  • Richard Bustamante 1
  • Roshan Sembacuttiaratchy 1
  • Ruslan Khamitov 1
  • Sam Lee 1
  • Sean Jordan 1
  • Sebastian Dörner 1
  • Sharon Zhou 1
  • Shiva Garg 1
  • Siddartha Janga 1
  • Simran Basi 1
  • Stan Chan 1
  • Stephen Ng 1
  • Tejas Shah 1
  • Test Analytics 1
  • Test Engineer 1
  • Tim Lyakhovetskiy 1
  • Tom O'Neill 1
  • Vojta Jína 1
  • automation 1
  • dead code 1
  • iOS 1
  • mutation testing 1


Archive


  • ►  2025 (1)
    • ►  jan (1)
  • ►  2024 (13)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  okt (1)
    • ►  sep (1)
    • ►  aug (1)
    • ►  júl (1)
    • ►  máj (3)
    • ►  apr (3)
    • ►  mar (1)
    • ►  feb (1)
  • ►  2023 (14)
    • ►  dec (2)
    • ►  nov (2)
    • ►  okt (5)
    • ►  sep (3)
    • ►  aug (1)
    • ►  apr (1)
  • ►  2022 (2)
    • ►  feb (2)
  • ►  2021 (3)
    • ►  jún (1)
    • ►  apr (1)
    • ►  mar (1)
  • ►  2020 (8)
    • ►  dec (2)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  okt (1)
    • ►  aug (2)
    • ►  júl (1)
    • ►  máj (1)
  • ►  2019 (4)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  júl (1)
    • ►  jan (1)
  • ►  2018 (7)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  sep (1)
    • ►  júl (1)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (1)
    • ►  feb (1)
  • ►  2017 (17)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  okt (1)
    • ►  sep (1)
    • ►  aug (1)
    • ►  júl (2)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (3)
    • ►  apr (2)
    • ►  feb (1)
    • ►  jan (2)
  • ►  2016 (15)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (2)
    • ►  okt (1)
    • ►  sep (2)
    • ►  aug (1)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (3)
    • ►  apr (1)
    • ►  mar (1)
    • ►  feb (1)
  • ►  2015 (14)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  okt (2)
    • ►  aug (1)
    • ►  jún (1)
    • ►  máj (2)
    • ►  apr (2)
    • ►  mar (1)
    • ►  feb (1)
    • ►  jan (2)
  • ►  2014 (24)
    • ►  dec (2)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  okt (2)
    • ►  sep (2)
    • ►  aug (2)
    • ►  júl (3)
    • ►  jún (3)
    • ►  máj (2)
    • ►  apr (2)
    • ►  mar (2)
    • ►  feb (1)
    • ►  jan (2)
  • ►  2013 (16)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (1)
    • ►  okt (1)
    • ►  aug (2)
    • ►  júl (1)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (2)
    • ►  apr (2)
    • ►  mar (2)
    • ►  jan (2)
  • ►  2012 (11)
    • ►  dec (1)
    • ►  nov (2)
    • ►  okt (3)
    • ►  sep (1)
    • ►  aug (4)
  • ►  2011 (39)
    • ►  nov (2)
    • ►  okt (5)
    • ►  sep (2)
    • ►  aug (4)
    • ►  júl (2)
    • ►  jún (5)
    • ►  máj (4)
    • ►  apr (3)
    • ►  mar (4)
    • ►  feb (5)
    • ►  jan (3)
  • ►  2010 (37)
    • ►  dec (3)
    • ►  nov (3)
    • ►  okt (4)
    • ►  sep (8)
    • ►  aug (3)
    • ►  júl (3)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (2)
    • ►  apr (3)
    • ►  mar (3)
    • ►  feb (2)
    • ►  jan (1)
  • ►  2009 (54)
    • ►  dec (3)
    • ►  nov (2)
    • ►  okt (3)
    • ►  sep (5)
    • ►  aug (4)
    • ►  júl (15)
    • ►  jún (8)
    • ►  máj (3)
    • ►  apr (2)
    • ►  feb (5)
    • ►  jan (4)
  • ▼  2008 (75)
    • ►  dec (6)
    • ►  nov (8)
    • ►  okt (9)
    • ►  sep (8)
    • ►  aug (9)
    • ▼  júl (9)
      • Circular Dependency in constructors and Dependency...
      • TotT: Testing Against Interfaces
      • How to Write 3v1L, Untestable Code
      • Breaking the Law of Demeter is Like Looking for a ...
      • YUI and GWT... How do you test?
      • Call for Attendance: GTAC 2008
      • How to Think About the "new" Operator with Respect...
      • TotT: EXPECT vs. ASSERT
      • Announcing: New Google C++ Testing Framework
    • ►  jún (6)
    • ►  máj (6)
    • ►  apr (4)
    • ►  mar (4)
    • ►  feb (4)
    • ►  jan (2)
  • ►  2007 (41)
    • ►  okt (6)
    • ►  sep (5)
    • ►  aug (3)
    • ►  júl (2)
    • ►  jún (2)
    • ►  máj (2)
    • ►  apr (7)
    • ►  mar (5)
    • ►  feb (5)
    • ►  jan (4)

Feed

  • Google
  • Privacy
  • Terms